Most have likely come across the concept of the K-shaped economy – given our industry does love to put letter shapes on things. In this case the K denotes a split in the U.S. consumer, with some doing really well (the upward sloped arm of the K) and some doing really poorly (the downward sloping arm of the K). Folks who own assets, stocks, property, businesses, are doing fabulously well. Markets near all-time highs and up a lot, the Bloomberg World Equity index has annualized 21% over the past three years. This has a tremendous wealth effect on consumers, but really just those with enough net worth invested in assets.
On the flip side, those that don’t own a lot of assets are dealing with wages that are growing but barely as much as inflation. Inflation, still high, is a tax on consumption so anyone who spends more on consumables is impacted more. If you are a big saver, its impact is not as strong. Add to this gasoline prices of $5 a gallon, up over 50% since the start of the year (U.S. average). Interest costs remain high and show little sign of coming down given the recent uptick in inflation. And most would agree, policy in the U.S. over the past bit has certainly been skewed to benefiting the wealthy vs. the less wealthy.
The K-shaped mood is certainly evident in consumer sentiment surveys. The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index (in the chart above) asks consumers about a number of things with the attempt to garner their willingness to buy stuff. It covers aspects like personal finances, general business conditions, what the markets are doing and prices. In May, it reached its lowest level since the survey inception in the late 1970s! So based on this survey, consumers are more in the dumps than during COVID, the financial crisis, or the high inflation period in the late 1970s / early 80s. Are things really that bad?
Historically, changing consumer sentiment has correlated with moves in the stock market. It’s hard to say whether a happier spendy consumer makes the stock market go up or the market going up makes consumers happy. A bit of a chicken-and-egg issue. Today though, markets are at new highs and the consumer is catatonic. This is very odd but there are some factors contributing to this divergence:
- Surveys – The efficacy of surveys has been on the decline over the past few years. Polls fall into this grouping as well. It seems respondents often answer one way and behave differently. And the response is more often negative, even if many consumers are clearly still spending.
- Composition – The market is asset weighted, meaning the attitude of the wealthy has a much bigger market impact than the attitude of those less wealthy. The S&P 500 is certainly not an equal democracy. However, factor #1 may be more significant because if you break down the consumer sentiment by income, the wealthy are in a marginally better mood than the lower income cohorts, but not by much. Maybe everyone is grumpy.
Survey nuances aside, folks are not happy or confident. Inflation, gas and interest rates are a tough combo right now. Plus, job growth has been very lacklustre. A lot of moving parts in labour from participation rates, demographics, immigration and maybe AI. This does appear to be making unemployment trends higher at the ‘new entrant’ cohort, while remaining low and stable at more tenured employees. This may also be contributing to the recent uptick in productivity, maybe AI or less new entrants. Sorry new entrants, despite your eagerness you just aren’t productive for some time.
Fortunately, the upper arm of the K simply matters much more for not just the stock markets but for the economy. So, while the lower arm of the K is struggling, the upper arm is spending, travelling, doing enough to keep total consumer spending growing. To be fair, the economy has always been K shaped, this isn’t new. Perhaps the spread is just getting wider.
Watch the Rich
With lower income cohorts struggling and higher income cohorts doing well, we should keep an eye on the spending habits of the higher income folks. Because fair or not, they have an outsized influence on the broader economy. So how does one gauge their mood and spending habits?
We have come up with four metrics, two on the services and two on goods. Travel is also a discretionary component of spending and tilted towards higher income consumers. Of course, business travel skews this data. Pricing is also a challenge, as we can see a big upswings in airfare spending recently but is this simply the result of rising ticket prices due to higher oil prices? We will opt to track number of passengers moving through TSA security checkpoints.
Most high-end restaurants are private, so kind of hard to get a feel for volumes. However, we believe the trend in sit-down restaurants may provide some insight. Perhaps more across the income cohorts, the decision to eat out vs. eat at home or quick serve is certainly a discretionary spending decision influenced by your personal financial situation. After creating a composite of 11 publicly traded sit-down restaurant chains, we compiled the average same-store-sales over time.
The goods related spending indicators are cosmetics and luxury. While we can debate whether skin care is discretionary or not, it is a category dominated by higher income cohorts and historically has proven very cyclical. Measuring luxury spending involves mostly European companies. We created a composite of seven global luxury brand companies covering a diverse range from purses to fashion to watches.
Broadly speaking the trends are decent based on these metrics. Not improving but not rolling over either. We will take this as the upper arm of the K is still spending.
Final Thoughts
The consumer drives the global economy. In fact, the U.S. consumer alone accounts for about 18% of the global economy. No denying the lower income U.S. consumer is in a tough spot, but the higher end continues to spend, hence the K shaped economy. But don’t fret the K at this point, we would only become worried if evidence arose the wealthy are starting to dial back. If, or when, that happens, look out because there is not much support further down the income spectrum.
— Craig Basinger at Purpose Investments.
Get the latest market insights in your inbox every week.
Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P.
The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed; their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions, or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on them. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and is specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
