Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Sep 19th, 2022

Stock & Bond Correlation

The path to the greatest wealth creation is to load up a portfolio into one security – you just have to pick the right one. Ask Jeff Bezos or Bill Gates. Unfortunately, choosing the right one is either impossible or luck with incredibly impossible odds. Ask Christian Gronet or Julie Wainwright, lesser-known innovative founders who just didn’t make it [Solyndra &]. So, investors opt for the safer and more reliable plan B to reach their long-term goals. Instead of shooting for the stars, invest in a well-diversified portfolio. Diversify by style, geography, and, most importantly, asset class. The biggest component for most portfolios is asset class diversification, primarily the combination of equities/stocks and bonds.

The foundational reasons to combine stocks and bonds are pretty intuitive. If the economy is doing well, earnings are growing, which helps the stock market perform well. But an economy that is doing well is inflationary, which pushes up yields, hurting bond prices. If the economy is doing poorly, well, the opposite should occur with stocks down and bonds up. So, stocks and bonds should be negatively correlated and provide great diversification, if combined, the mythical smooth ride.

If only investing were that easy or simple. The fact is, there are many factors at work, and this results in changing correlations between asset classes over time. Today, we are going to talk stock and bond correlations. For the obvious reason, there are many upset investors (and portfolio managers) that don’t like the fact that stocks and bonds have been moving in the same direction as one another (positively correlated). Everyone expects a degree of volatility in equities, but it sure helps the portfolio during periods when equities are going down if your bonds go up. That has not been the trend of late.

Canadian equity returns

It is pretty easy to see in the above scatter plots of monthly stock/equity returns vs bond returns [the purple line is the trend]. From 2009 until the onset of the pandemic in March 2020, monthly returns between stocks and bonds were really all over the place and didn’t show much of an underlying relationship. This would be ‘uncorrelated,’ which helps a portfolio’s diversification as the two assets behave rather independently. Now the chart on the right from the onset of the pandemic until now shows a different pattern. Only two months had stocks down and bonds up. And there are many months that both stocks and bonds were lower or higher together. Again, this provides less diversification benefit if they are moving in the same direction.

So, have market dynamics changed to neutralize the benefits of combining stocks and bonds in a portfolio? Not so fast. First off, there are so many strange dynamics afoot in the markets today. Given the lingering reverberations caused by the pandemic, jumping to conclusions is not a good idea. Especially throwing out decades of data because of a year or so. The fact is, correlations do change over time, and they are currently more positive.

Correlation and beta between Canadian stocks and bonds have never been stable

Truthfully, correlations between stocks and bonds have been positive for a few years now, not just in 2022. Nobody seemed to mind the positive correlation when stocks and bonds were moving higher together. As you can see in the above chart, from 2000-2020, correlations were low or negative for the majority of that period. Not so in the 1990s or earlier.

So, if correlations are going to remain high, does this negate the benefit of stock and bond diversification? No. It may soften the benefit, but correlation measures direction, not magnitude. That is where beta comes in, measuring the degree of the move in stocks and bonds (thin black line in the above chart). Over the past two years, the correlation between bonds and stocks has risen to roughly 0.5, but the beta remains low at about 0.2. Meaning if your stocks fall 5%, bonds should fall by 1%. Since down 1% is better than down 5%, there is still a benefit.

Plus, the high correlation won’t stay high, either. One factor that does appear to have a strong relationship with the stock-to-bond correlation is the variability in central bank rates. When central bank rates are moving, the stock-to-bond correlation tends to be much higher. When central bank rates are stable, the stock-to-bond correlation tends to be much lower. This certainly makes sense. Changes to the central bank overnight rate changes the risk-free rate, either up or down. The risk-free rate is a component in the valuation of both stocks in bonds, so changes impact both asset classes in the same direction.

Volatile central bank rates impacts the stock / bond correlation

Portfolio Construction

Given the outlook for central bank rates certainly points to continued action in the current fight against inflation, the bad news is this will contribute to keeping the stock-to-bond correlation higher. That being said, a higher correlation isn’t always bad. When inflation starts to roll over, the market will likely start to price in a cooling of the overnight bank rate, which may very well lift the prices of both stocks and bonds simultaneously. Yay, positive correlation.

The yin and yang of stocks and bonds aren’t broken. Maybe people just thought it was a hard rule or constant instead of a variable relationship over time. The diversification benefits between stocks and bonds may not be as strong as in years past, but they will be again. Certainly, explore ‘new’ diversification strategies, but please don’t mess with the core of portfolio construction because of a couple of years of data. Besides, buying bonds that yield 5% does feel a lot safer than buying them a few years ago, yielding 2%. Not saying we love bonds, but we sure don’t dislike them anymore.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights to your inbox each week.

Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only, and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable, however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.