Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Oct 16th, 2023

Sometimes, Even a Free Lunch Can Taste Bad

Harry Markowitz, the father of modern portfolio construction, is often quoted as saying, “Diversification is the only free lunch” in investing. Diversifying across more equity holdings, more bond holdings, more geographies, and more distinct asset classes reduces risk. This is why don’t put all your money just into one stock. If you pick the right stock, it is fantastic, but the downside of vastly higher probability scenarios is rather dire. So, we diversify across multiple equities, bonds, cash, alternatives, commodities, etc.

Diversification works because different investments have different correlations with one another. Correlation measures how two investments move in coordination with one another. The lower the correlation, the better the potential risk reduction benefits of adding to a portfolio. There is a return assumption component as well, but we will park that for now. Diversification works because different investments are not perfectly correlated.

But even a free lunch of diversification can leave a bad taste in your mouth. There is variability in the process. For your lunch, maybe the vegetables were not so fresh, or the chef was off that day. For diversification, correlations are not constant; they fluctuate. Sometimes correlations are stronger than usual, limiting the risk reduction benefits of diversification. Sometimes lower, really helping.

Bonds may not be as strong a diversification tool, but now they do have a more attractive expected return

At the moment, correlations are higher, especially if you focus on the big two asset classes, bonds & equities (bottom portion of nearby chart). This does bring back some memories of the portfolio pain of 2022, which witnessed falling bond prices and falling stock prices. But starting in March of this year, correlations quickly turned negative and, more recently, back to positive. An easier way to glean this relationship is the following chart. It only looks at down days for the TSX and contrasts how bonds performed that day.

Bonds, not as stabilizing as they used to be

There is a very important takeaway from these two charts. Diversification didn’t work well in 2022 and 2H of 2023 (so far). But it worked well in the 1st half of 2023, which raises the big question – Why? 2022 was a unique year during which the overnight bank rate (as measured by the Fed Funds) moved from near zero to 4.5%, which dragged longer yields along as well. Guess what? If you raise the discount rate that much, the price of all assets moves in one direction: down. Correlations also increase, reducing the benefit of diversification.

The first half of 2023 witnessed the expectations of peak rates plateauing or stabilizing for the most part. More importantly, with the economic risks around U.S. regional banks, recession risk moved higher. Bond/equity correlations became negative again, diversification worked, and we all enjoyed a nice free lunch. But now, in the second half of 2023, we have seen some recession risks fade and treasury issuance/demand risks (see last week’s edition). Once again, correlations elevated and diversification benefits dwindled. This is not the same as 2022, when it was an inflation problem. Inflation expectations and breakevens have remained relatively stable or even improved somewhat.

Recent rise in yields had nothing to do with inflation... which remains stable to falling

So, where do correlations go next? Inflation is gradually improving, lowering the risk of any material increases in the overnight bank rates. That is good news and supports lower correlations. If this recession starts to show up more, that too would lower bond yields and likely have bond/equity correlations behaving closer to long-term averages. On the other side, if yields keep rising due to imbalances or the ‘no landing’ scenario for the economy, diversification between equities and bonds will suffer.

Has the job of bonds in the portfolio changed? There is a silver lining with all these higher yields: the future return of bonds is higher. Much higher than it was before, albeit a painful journey to get here. For instance, when the Canadian bond universe was yielding 1-2.5%, most investors owned bonds almost entirely for diversification or portfolio stabilization purposes. And while the losses over the past couple of years have probably cast some doubt on that stabilization role, there is no denying future returns have improved. The best indicator for future returns for bonds is the forward-looking yield.

Bond / Equity correlations worked, then didn't, then did and now not

With bonds perhaps not as strong a diversifier as years past but with better future return prospects, are there other diversifiers? The chart below is rolling 12-month correlations between a few asset classes and Canadian equities. Clearly, international equities have a high correlation. You can see the bond correlation becoming elevated as well.

We also included commodity prices. Now, we could have used just energy, and the results are similar. This might be of interest as there are some who now argue oil or energy is a good diversifier because energy did well in 2022. This is recency bias; don’t fall for it. As is mega-cap tech.

The one line on the graph that stands out is the U.S. dollar. Yes, for Canadians, USD exposure is a strong diversification tool, given it receives safe haven flows during times of trouble. We’re not saying anyone needs to go out and buy USD; instead, just make sure you have enough USD exposure through other investment vehicles, such as equities or bonds. In a world where it is becoming harder to find diversification, US dollar exposure continues to deliver for Canadian investors.

Correlations change over time, but perhaps the best diversifier for Canadians remains the US dollar

Final Thoughts

We may not be fans of the US dollar when the next cycle truly gets going. But for now, we embrace it for its diversification benefits. And bonds may have failed to be the stabilizer over the past couple years but now offer a much more attractive potential performance contribution. Additionally, if a recession is coming, as we believe, it may quickly become that stabilizer once again.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger, CFA

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.