Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Jun 30th, 2025

High Valuations, High Stakes

Most would agree this has been a rather unique year so far. The TSX is making new all-time highs. At the same time, both earnings and economic growth forecasts keep coming down.

The TSX isn’t just up – it’s up nicely at almost 9% as we near the halfway point. It isn’t abnormal for the top 10 contributors to make up over half the gains of this index that contains 223 companies, but the mix is odd, with five gold companies, two financials, one consumer, one technology and one energy.  

The S&P is even more odd. Up only 4.2%, the index has become very concentrated given the market caps of the Mag7, which carry a 31% weight in the index. This isn’t anything new, but the divergence sure is. Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Meta are the three biggest contributors to the S&P so far this year, adding +2.8%. But Apple, Tesla and Alphabet are the biggest detractors, subtracting -2.4%. Clearly, we have a bifurcation of the Mag 7.

Bifurcation of Mag7

There is a clear distinction between the Mag7 winners and losers: earnings growth. The average earnings growth over the next 12 months is +19% for NVIDIA, Microsoft & Meta, the positive index contributors. The average earnings growth for the laggards, such as Apple, Tesla and Alphabet, is -5%. High valuations are not necessarily a headwind for stock performance, unless those earnings start to wobble. Then it’s a big problem.

Q2 Earnings Season Is Critical

In a few weeks, earnings season for the second quarter will kick off, and while every earnings season is important, this one may be even more critical. After the recent market rally, and with indices making new highs, valuations are rather elevated. The S&P 500 has peaked out at around 22x a few times over the past five years. And while the TSX has seen valuations as high as 18x over the past decade, it certainly isn’t cheap anymore.

S&P 500 PE ratio has topped out a few times around 22, TSX is cheaper but it, too, is now elevated vs. historic

The challenge is that valuations are elevated at the same time that earnings growth is slowing. We would be more comfortable with a 22x multiple for the S&P 500 if earnings were still growing at 12%. But at 7%, we believe that’s precarious. The same issue applies to Canada, but to a lesser extent.

2025 earnings growth has decelerated from double digits to mid-single digits

There are some optimistic factors, though. The bar may be set reasonably low for Q2 earnings after all these negative revisions, and there are some signs the revisions have slowed or even turned a bit positive in the past couple of weeks. The U.S. dollar is also lower, which is generally positive for U.S. S&P 500 earnings, given the decent percentage of sales/operations overseas.  

The headwind is well known: Mr. Uncertainty. The extended period of volatility around tariffs has certainly reduced the confidence of company leaders in the outlook. During Q1 earnings season, the trend was for companies to pull guidance as they just didn’t know what would happen. Still, without clarity, will we see more companies pull guidance, or are they going to start reducing guidance? That is likely a more important factor in this upcoming earnings season than the number of companies that exceed estimates.

Trend of keyword "uncertainty" in S&P 500 earning calls

The valuations, or market multiple, are certainly elevated, but they’re influenced by many factors other than earnings growth. Bond yields have come down over the past few weeks, which has helped the multiple expand. Investor sentiment has improved from overly bearish to more of a neutral mood. The geopolitical headlines certainly impact the multiple, and most of this news flow has been market-friendly of late.

The challenge is that these positive levers have already been pulled. To help this market keep going, we would likely need to see a re-acceleration of earnings growth to maintain or improve the current multiple. That may be a big ask.

Final Thoughts

Will the months of uncertainty, which are starting to show up in some pockets of economic data, also show up in earnings this season? Maybe, but the stock-moving factor will likely be the tone and guidance from company leadership. And given valuations are already at the upper echelon, stumbles may prove painful.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights in your inbox every week.


Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,”“will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger, CFA

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.