Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Apr 10th, 2023

Bonds Being Bonds Again, Who Knew?

For years bonds had a single job in portfolios, providing a ballast during periods of equity market weakness. Ok, maybe spin off a little income along the way. But most portfolios had been receiving as much or more of their income from equities, given yields were rather low. Then came 2022, and bonds didn’t just drop the ball – they fumbled, stumbled, and kicked the ball out of bounds. The TSX fell -5.8%, the S&P -18.1%, and Canadian bonds dropped by -11.8%.

For the past decade looking at rolling monthly returns for the TSX & Canadian bonds, there is no denying bonds have provided a good stabilizer for portfolios. Slicing the data to only those periods when the TSX declined, bonds, on average, were flat. Hence the stabilizer. But if you look at 2022 till the end of February this year, not so much of a stabilizer. During this period, when the market was down, it was down an average of -3.9%, and bonds were down an average of -1.2%. We don’t want to jinx it because one month does not make a trend, but March saw equities down and bonds up.

When equities are down, bonds provide stability

So, are bonds back to being bonds again? Maybe. March was an odd month with a bit of a market scare driven by fears over the impact of deposit flows on banks. Adding to this, the surprisingly strong economic data that had been the trend for the past few months has started to surprise a bit in the other direction. This was all good for bonds while not great for equities.

Forecasting correlations has got to be just about as hard as trying to forecast markets. But there are a few factors that tend to influence the bond/equity correlation over time. Correlations tend to be higher during periods of higher economic growth and lower when growth slows. Now if you are in the camp that the economy is slowing, as we are, then that favours lower correlations.

The bigger impact is short-term rates. When central banks cut or raise rates, the correlation tends to be higher. Now we are not jumping to believe this is necessarily a causal relationship. Often when central banks are cutting rates, there is trouble in the markets or economy, which is a risk-off environment that naturally enjoys a strong negative correlation between equities and bonds. But when they raise rates, it increases the discount rate for the valuation of equities and bonds – helping them move in tandem.

So if we have seen peak rates (or if we are close), and if the economic temperature is cooling, bond/equity correlations should be lower than we have seen in the past year. The chart below captures the rolling 2-month correlation and slope between equities and bonds. Correlation gets most of the attention, but the size of the move matters too. Both have turned negative of late.

bonds are back doing their job

Now, this could reverse for any number of reasons. First, if inflation re-accelerated or economic growth picks up, that certainly wouldn’t help. There is another buffer that helps bonds; namely, they now have a more attractive yield than years past. Perhaps one of the best charts we have come across to show this is from iShares. The chart below uses Bloomberg data to compile what percentage of the bond market trading with a 4% or better yield. It really highlights that yields today are simply back to more normal times, which is very different from the yield drought of the 2010s.

percent of fixed income markets yielding over 4%

Final Thoughts

Inflation may not yet be over, and a recession is far from a certainty in the near term. However, the return of negative correlations between equities and bonds is a welcome change of events. The near-term sustainability of this relationship will depend on what lies ahead for the economy, risk appetite and, of course, the path of central banks. But with higher yields than years past and an increasing probability of a recession ahead, duration has quickly become a positive influence for portfolios.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights to your inbox each week.

Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger, CFA

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.