Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Feb 12th, 2024

American Exceptionalism

Over the past month or so, the economic data from America has certainly turned up somewhat. A strong Q4 GDP print of 3.1%, two back-to-back months of 300k+ job gains, and even manufacturing activity has ticked higher. So, where is this recession that has been the talk of the town for the past year or even longer?  It appears to be almost everywhere else.  Maybe not outright recession, but certainly weakness. The latest GDP readings are negative in the UK, Canada, Germany and Japan, leaving only two of the G7 members with positive economic growth.

Latest quarterly GDP Growth rates clearly show divergence among different economies

Much of this divergence can be explained by two factors: economic sensitivity to interest rates and global trade. Countries that are more sensitive to rates and global trade are doing worse; those less exposed are doing better. 

As we all know, rates/yields have moved substantially higher over the past couple of years, yet that impacts different parts of the economy differently.  Based on different economic compositions from one country to the next, rate changes can hurt more or less. The U.S., for instance, is less sensitive to rates given the structure of their mortgage market. Dominated by 30-year fixed mortgages, changes in rates don’t impact consumers’ mortgage payments as much. It is estimated the U.S. has less than 10% of mortgages set to variable rates, compared to 30% in Canada. Furthermore, fixed mortgages in Canada max out at 5 years, meaning the resetting of higher payments is increasingly being felt as mortgages are renewed.

GDP = C + I + G + (X -M).  C is for Consumer spending, I is for investment, G is government spending and (X-M) are exports minus imports or trade. Different countries have different weights in these categories. For instance, Consumer spending is by far the biggest piece of the U.S. economy, while trade is relatively small.  Compare that to Germany or Japan, both of which have much larger economic weightings in trade. Same with Canada.

The big question is whether or not U.S. economic exceptionalism can endure long enough to wait for negative economic momentum elsewhere to turn the corner. After all, even if an economy is less sensitive to higher rates or slowing global trade, it still has an impact.  There is some encouraging news on the global trade front. While still early, Purchasing Manager surveys that provide a proxy for manufacturing activity have started to improve. Half of the 16 biggest manufacturing countries had a PMI reading in January above 50.

Manufacturing activity appears to be turning up

While encouraged, our view on manufacturing is tempered. Manufacturing activity exploded during the pandemic as we all wanted more goods. As the pandemic diminished, consumers returned to more normal spending patterns. So, that spike in 2021/22 was followed by a dearth in 2023. Global spending growth appears to be slowing, likely due to higher rates.

Wait for it, but we could be getting close to a period when good economic news stops being suitable for markets. This incredible run over the past three months has seen the S&P 500 rise 14 of the past 15 weeks ­­­­­­­­­– a feat not repeated since the early 1970s. The initial rise was from an oversold market that started celebrating more evidence that inflation was coming down, opening the door for rate cuts this year.  This traversed from inflation optimism to optimism about U.S. economic strength.  Unfortunately, strong economic growth does not jive with rate cuts nor with inflation making a speedy decline down to the magic 2% realm. 

Final Thoughts

The U.S. is the biggest economy in the world, and its equity market now carries about a 70% weight in the MSCI World Index. Yes, if you buy a passive cap-weighted global equity ETF, it's really just the S&P 500 plus some odds and sods. The U.S. economy could certainly remain immune to slowing growth elsewhere. Maybe the stock market can keep climbing with earnings growth slowing.  However, the biggest constant for both markets and economies is often reversion to the mean.  And both are well above their means at the moment. 

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights to your inbox every week.

Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger, CFA

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.