Last week was yet another one cementing the need for investors to navigate the noise by ignoring it. One would think a playground fight (on X) between the president and the world’s richest man would have negative implications. But the market has gotten over it and moved on, buoyed by a labour report that wasn’t bad.
It was kind of a neutral report, but since many were expecting a weak one, neutral is good; it lifted the S&P 500 back over 6,000. That’s S&P 6,000 to start the year: up a bit, then down a lot to under 5,000, and then back to 6,000. Anyone reacting to the headlines or policy announcements during the journey has probably caused a bit of damage to their portfolio.
Remember when Canada was doomed to a recession, the loonie was at 68 cents, politicians were resigning, etc.? Well, Q1 GDP was up over 2%, the CAD is now above 73 cents, and the TSX has been making new all-time highs for a few weeks now. Of course, the future is always uncertain. The key lessons for 2025 are:
- Listen to the news, largely because it’s almost impossible not to.
- Don’t react to it, as you will likely end up just chasing your tail (dog reference, but it applies to portfolios too).
- Price matters.
Do you feel the market is riskier today or riskier in the early days of April, as President Trump announced tariffs on everyone rocking global markets? Trick question – an S&P 4,900 in the early days of April is less risky than an S&P 6,000, whether in February or in June. A lower price carries less risk. This is a crazy year from a news and headline perspective, and it is likely best to use price as an input tool.
It’s fair to say the equity markets were ignoring the trade uncertainty or policy risk in the early days of 2025. Even with announcements of tariff intentions being made, the narrative was that an offramp or solution would be found. Then the market took the tariff policy risk seriously. In retrospect, too seriously, given the market recovery over the past couple of months. Underreaction, overreaction, underreaction?
So now could be an opportune time to reduce market exposure, especially if you were fortuitous enough to have added during the period of weakness. With the S&P 500 over 6,000, this market could be risky again.
There are encouraging factors for the markets at the moment. The trade tensions have certainly cooled, and this may continue. The weaker US dollar is positive for global markets and the price level of the S&P 500. Oil being down in the $60s certainly helps the global consumer. And with many of the policy announcements from the U.S. being, let’s say, market unfriendly, there are likely more market-friendly components in the coming months, such as less regulation, etc.
BUT the bearish case could also be pretty strong. Rising long-term yields are causing a bit of angst among investors. Earnings revisions continue to soften. Last week’s U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics report was OK, but labour is always a very slow and lagging indicator.
Overall, the economic data does appear to be slowing. Add to that a U.S. tax bill that has raised many eyebrows on the level of spending and potential taxation changes for foreign capital, and let’s not forget the recent trend of global investors moving money elsewhere (in case you were wondering WHY the TSX was making new highs, this global trend has helped).
There is nothing that’s doom and gloom, however. At 6,000, is the U.S. market underreacting to the risks? Especially for the U.S. market? Even with the relative trailing performance year-to-date, the S&P 500 is still trading over 22x and is now expected to only enjoy 6% earnings growth, far below the 10%+ pace of last year. Earnings growth for 2025 has moderated everywhere, but other markets are not trading over 20x. Hence, we believe S&P 6,000 to be risky.
Add on top of this a trend in the economic data that has Europe and Asia seeing more upside surprises while the U.S. data is the laggard.
Final Thoughts
Only in hindsight can you see if the market was overreacting or underreacting to a risk or opportunity. It’s easy to say it overreacted to trade policy risk, but harder to say it is now underreacting to risks or properly reacting to upside potential. Over 6,000, a 22x multiple with slowing economic data, and a negative earnings revision trend, we think it’s underreacting to risks. We believe it may be a good time to trim.
— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments
Get the latest market insights in your inbox every week.
Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L. P.
The content of this document is for informational purposes only and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable; however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,”“will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are, by their nature, based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.