Blog Hero Image

Posted by Craig Basinger on Jun 12th, 2023

It's Priced In

Have you ever heard the words “it's priced in,” referring to the market or an investment pricing in some sort of potential negative event? The TSX is trading at 13x earnings estimates, historically low for this index, clearly pricing in some uncertainty or potential recession ahead. The S&P is trading at 19.7, which is historically high, implying the U.S. may not be pricing in much chance of a slowdown. Truth be told, in our years of investing, it's never completely priced in. Even the low-valuation markets will likely feel some pain if a recession does come. But likely less pain compared with those markets that are not pricing in any potential bad news.

Let us instead look at valuations as a safety buffer, never pricing in all the bad news but a portion or degree, depending on which investment or market you may be looking at. Using 20 years of valuation ranges, we broke down some major equity markets to contrast current and recent valuations. For instance, at the start of 2022, global equities were very close to record-high valuations. Then by the end of the year or the start of 2023, valuations were well below average. A bear market can do that. And now valuations are back up in the most expensive quartile.

Breaking it down a bit more, based on the past 20 years, the U.S., Japan, and NASDAQ are the markets priced to near perfection. While Canada, Europe and China are in the dumps, possibly pricing in a potential recession or at least partially priced in.

some markets are pricing in a recession

Of course, then the question is how to look at valuations. One could argue the last 20 years is not the greatest sample period. However, another factor is the 'earnings’ part of valuations. Earnings have contracted a bit over the past few months, but how far will earnings fall if a recession is coming? If they fall a lot, perhaps some of those markets that appear to be pricing in a decent amount of recession risk are not as cheap as they look.

The chart below has a lot going on. The data table at the top of the chart shows how far each sector’s earnings have already contracted so far in 2023 and the average earnings contraction during past recessions and economic slowdowns. These include the 2001, 2008 and 2020 recessions, plus the economic slowdowns in 1998, 2015 and 2018. The bars below show the price-to-earnings today, the median over the past 30 years and what today’s PE ratio would be if earnings contracted by the average of past recessions/slowdowns.

parts of the S&P are pricing in some bad news

For example, the energy sector is trading very cheap, and if earnings, which are already down 29%, fell by 68%, this would still have valuations roughly in line with historical norms. In other words, the energy sector appears to be pricing in a good amount of recession risk. The same can be said for Health Care, which actually tends to hold up well during periods of economic weakness. Materials, Financials, and Telcos are not pricing in as much risk but still a decent amount. On the other end of the spectrum, Information Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary sectors do not appear to be pricing in much risk.

We did the same thing for the TSX. Not surprisingly, TSX often sees bigger contractions in earnings during periods of economic weakness. The good news is that valuations are low, and if we have an average earnings recession, current valuations are just about in line with historical norms, as do financials and energy. We would caution against making conclusions on some sectors given the narrowness of companies or other ‘TSX’-centric nuances.

more parts of the TSX are pricing in some sort of economic slowdown

Credit Markets

For the most part, credit markets are signalling some degree of caution, but despite recession fears, spreads have not widened dramatically. In fact, they have fallen a decent amount over the past couple of weeks and remain well below the recent highs seen last September. With high yield spreads currently at +433bps, they are a little elevated, but not much. The credit market is discounting relatively benign economic conditions going forward. Within the high-yield space, lower-quality, CCC-rated corporate bond spreads are perhaps telling a slightly different story. The bifurcation of the high-yield bond market remains elevated. More credit-worthy companies are still able to borrow at more reasonable spreads; however, the gap between BB and CCC-rated spreads is considerably wider compared with other periods corresponding with similar spreads in the high-yield market. The lowest-rated junk bonds are showing meaningful credit risk in the U.S

Spreads between BB and CCC corporate bonds are in a bit of a twilight zone right now. Historically this zone is where spreads spend some time digesting forthcoming credit conditions before jumping higher during a liquidity/credit crunch. We’ve yet to see any real spike.

Some investors may hold off getting excited about high yield, perhaps waiting for spreads to blow out between 600 and 800 basis points based on where they topped out prior to previous recessions or economic slowdowns. The space is somewhat enticing with a yield-to-maturity in the large U.S. junk bond ETFs north of 8%. For now, we’re comfortably less exposed to the space. We believe we’ll get a better opportunity when spreads take heed from the early warning call from the lower-quality borrowers.

all is calm in the overall high-yield bond market

Commercial Real Estate

Concerns over the office real estate sector following the pandemic have increased over the past few months, in part due to the mini banking crisis among U.S. regional banks. Whether it's rising rates, sky-high vacancy rates thanks to a painfully slow return to office or concerns over leverage, there is no shortage of bad news or bear case arguments. No doubt, there are a lot of troubled office buildings, as well as other troubled properties such as malls etc. The risks inherent in the space are high, but the prices of many of these REITs are also incredibly low. Canadian Office REITs are down 55% from their pre-pandemic high. The total return index is down to levels last seen in early 2016. The spread between Office REITs and other types widened considerably this year as seen in the chart below. There’s also a large disconnect between the public and private markets. At some point – and to be clear, we don’t know if we’re there yet – office REITs will be a buy simply because they have overly discounted a worst-case scenario.

office REITs have lagged all others

Determining when enough of the bad news is already priced into the market is a challenging but potentially lucrative task. It involves a lot of subjective judgement simply because if there was enough hard data to reinforce the view, the market would have already reacted to it. Some of the factors to assist in trying to address this are market sentiment, lack of a market reaction on bad news as well as digging into the fundamentals and factoring in worst-case scenarios.

Final Thoughts

This is an interesting time for investing. Parts of the market are rich with euphoria and are paying no mind to valuations. Other parts are clearly pricing in a lot of bad news. ‘It is fully priced in’ never really comes to pass because we never know what ‘it’ is or its depth and duration. The good today is whatever ‘it’ is; parts of the market have priced in a decent portion. And that provides a bit of a safety buffer. The same cannot be said about other parts of the market.

— Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments
— Derek Benedet is a Portfolio Manager at Purpose Investments

Get the latest market insights to your inbox each week.

Sources: Charts are sourced to Bloomberg L.P.

The content of this document is for informational purposes only, and is not being provided in the context of an offering of any securities described herein, nor is it a recommendation or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security. The information is not investment advice, nor is it tailored to the needs or circumstances of any investor. Information contained in this document is not, and under no circumstances is it to be construed as, an offering memorandum, prospectus, advertisement or public offering of securities. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority has reviewed this document and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Information contained in this document is believed to be accurate and reliable, however, we cannot guarantee that it is complete or current at all times. The information provided is subject to change without notice.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements ("FLS") are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "expect," "anticipate," intend," "plan," "believe," "estimate" or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments and the portfolio manager cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Craig Basinger, CFA

Craig Basinger is the Chief Market Strategist at Purpose Investments. With over 25 years of investment experience, Craig combines an educational foundation in economics & psychology with years of experience in both fundamental and quantitative research. A long-term student of the markets, Craig’s thoughts and insights can be seen in his Market Ethos publications and through his regular contributions on BNN.

Craig and his team bring a transparent and cost-efficient approach to investment management. The team provides asset allocation OCIO services and directly manages over $1 billion in assets. The team manages dividend mandates, quantitative risk reduction strategies and asset allocation services.

Derek Benedet

Derek is a Portfolio Manager at Purpose Investments. He has worked for the past sixteen years in the investment industry with experience at CIBC Wood Gundy, GMP Securities as well as Richardson Wealth. He is a Chartered Market Technician (CMT), a designation obtained through expertise in technical analyses and is granted by the Market Technicians Association. His unique investment approach combines technical analysis, quantitative finance and fundamental analysis.