Reading Time: 6 minutes

The market correction experienced in late January and February of this year was largely attributed to rising bond yields. Yields, as measured by the 10-year US Treasury remained largely rangebound for all of 2017 between 2.2-2.5%. It was the move from 2.5% to 3.0% that seemed to be the primary culprit for the market sell-off. Since the correction, yields have remained rangebound again from March until now, yet in a higher range of 2.8% to 3.1%.

From a simplistic perspective, higher yields are negative for equity prices. If you agree a company or equity is worth its future cash flow discounted back to today, then higher yields apply a higher discount rate to those cash flows. Hence, higher yields equal lower equity prices. $1 in ten years time is worth $0.82 present value with a 2.0% discount compared to $0.74 if discounted at 3.0%.

Moreover, there is a strong argument that the market is historically more sensitive to yields today than in decades past. Following the financial crisis, global central banks did everything they could to lower bond yields via uber-low central bank rates and very aggressive quantitative easing. After such a long period of low rates/yields, the sensitivity to a move higher should have a greater impact.

Successful investing is really about figuring out who is wrong

Investing, in its purest form, is really about trying to find out where and when the market is wrong. When we say ‘market,’ we mean the consensus of everyone trading in the market. Sure, every manager dresses up their process with fancy marketing pitches such as ‘we buy great companies, with solid management that are trading at a discount,’ but managers are trying to profit from the mistake of others. We believe one mistake the ‘market’ is making today is in not appreciating the inflationary pressures that are building and how these could be transmitted into bond yields and asset prices.

“It has been said critically that there is a tendency in many armies to spend the peacetime studying how to win the last war,” wrote Lieutenant Colonel J.L. Schley in 1929. This tendency to focus and prepare for a repeat of the last conflict, instead of adapting and preparing for different subsequent scenarios, has undermined many military commanders. Investors and even central bankers are not so different. Just look around at how many products and strategies have been created that would perform better if we have a repeat of 2008/09. And on the yield/inflationary side, after years of being fearful of deflation or not enough inflation, we believe the market continues to pay little heed to the balance of risk tilting away from deflation and more towards inflation.

MRB Partners did a great in-depth dive on inflation/deflation, much of which we agree on within our analysis. Specifically, they broke down pricing pressures from various sources and contrasted today’s environment with that of a decade ago. Chart 2 contains these price drivers and which are putting upward or downward pressure on inflation. As you can see, ten years ago it was all eliciting deflationary pressures. Fast forward to today, and while technology and commodity prices are still providing some deflationary pressures, the other six factors appear to have switched.

The changes have been gradual; there is no one day these switch, which can cause market participants not to register the change as easily. Today, economic growth is rather robust and evident in most economies, many of which are now expanding above capacity. Monetary policy has switched with some central banks tightening policy. Wage pressures, while still not strong, are rising. Asset prices have become much more elevated. Commodity prices are probably a bit more mixed now, some higher and some lower. For years, global trade offered steady deflationary pressure as production was moved from higher to lower cost countries. This trend has slowed dramatically as many of these lower-cost countries are now seeing higher prices. Tariffs also slow this deflationary pressure. Finally, the rise of the US dollar has stopped or slowed, mitigating the currency’s historical deflationary pressure.

While we do believe bond yields will continue to move higher, not just in the US but globally, this isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Yes, there are likely pain points for the equity market where yields may trigger a sell-off. It’s anyone’s guess where these are, and we would note, any sudden move on better data could easily spill over into equity market weakness. However, as long as these moves in bond yields are driven by improving economic activity, the sell-offs should be brief.

And to refute our simple present value of future cash flow example from earlier, if economic activity is higher and the company earns $1.20 in ten years instead of just a $1.00, well that pretty much takes care of the higher discount rate.

Portfolio implications

We don’t even have to be 100% right to win, we just need to be less wrong to add value. Today, we believe the market is wrong in its implied pricing of future inflation. This can be seen in Chart 3, which shows how much inflation is priced into the bond market. With our expectation that the market is underpricing the risk of higher inflation pressure, hence a fast pace of interest rate hikes and higher bond yields, this does have portfolio-positioning implications.

Remain shorter duration on fixed-income allocations. Even the short end is starting to offer an attractive yield. We would say to be underweight, but this view on yields must be tempered with the fact that we are late in the market cycle and now is not the time to be too light on defensive bonds.

Within equities, continue to remain cautious or underweight in the more interest-rate sensitive ‘bond proxies.’ This includes utilities, real estate, pipelines, telecoms and, to a lesser extent, consumer staples. We would say some of these are starting to offer greater value than years past, thanks in part to the recent rise in yields. And some value-oriented positioning is warranted, but in aggregate: best to keep the group lighter than normal.


— Craig Basinger, Chris Kerlow, Derek Benedet and Shane Obata are members of Richardson GMP’s Connected Wealth team which manages Purpose Core Equity Income FundPurpose Tactical Asset Allocation Fund and Purpose Behavioural Opportunities Fund

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investment funds. Please read the prospectus before investing. If the securities are purchased or sold on a stock exchange, you may pay more or receive less than the current net asset value. The indicated rate of return is the historical annual compounded total return including changes in share/unit value and reinvestment of all distributions and does not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any securityholder that would have reduced returns. Investment funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated
Certain statements in this document are forward-looking. Forward-looking statements (“FLS”) are statements that are predictive in nature, depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “anticipate,” intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate” or other similar expressions. Statements that look forward in time or include anything other than historical information are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results, actions or events could differ materially from those set forth in the FLS. FLS are not guarantees of future performance and are by their nature based on numerous assumptions. Although the FLS contained in this document are based upon what Purpose Investments believe to be reasonable assumptions, Purpose Investments cannot assure that actual results will be consistent with these FLS. The reader is cautioned to consider the FLS carefully and not to place undue reliance on the FLS. Unless required by applicable law, it is not undertaken, and specifically disclaimed, that there is any intention or obligation to update or revise FLS, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.